Besides, my Disaster Dragons would die. Its the only chance to make Fusions actually survive in today's game Polymerization is a terrible card. Card should be banned.
Should be banned, but I don't want it to be banned because if was, it kills Disaster Dragons and severely hits other decks. As someone gracefully said in another thread Stop confusing your personalities. Unless there is another FTK that I don't know about, then it's ok 1. It is broken and a terrible card design, but it only makes a tier 3 deck good, it's not like it is a meta card.
This time I pressed Caps Lock. In a very inconsistent way, it's five exodia pieces. I think it's fine at 1. Future Fusion, and your opinion on why it hasn't been or should be banned. Start new topic. Future fusion is now one of the ultimate bait cards, once you activate it, they have two turns to try to do something to get it off the field.
If they fail to get future fusion of the field, now you have a fusion monster looking down on you that you have to get rid of. This is also a card that your opponent can not just wait to worry about it. They need to do something as fast as they can. If your opponent decides to twin twister your future fusion, you may lose a pretty powerful card, but now you have a one card advantage, and they only have four cards in their hand to deal with whatever field you decide to make.
Even after the errata, whatever fusion monster you decide to bring out will be just as strong as it was before. Being able to fusion summon a monster using nothing but your deck will be a good thing to have for a lot of fusion decks in the game. Future fusion is also a card that puts a lot of panic on your opponent. Future fusion is also really broken when you use it with the invoked cards.
You do not even have to run summoning magic anymore, since future fusion can just bring one straight out of the deck. If you have future fusion and summoning magic, then that gives you two copies of any fusion you need, like merkabah, or raideen. Future fusion also works as a secondary brilliant fusion, but without the attack loss. You still get the extra normal summon, but now you have a atk beater on the field. The only downside to using future fusion to bring all of these out is the turn you have to wait, and that it becomes easier to destroy the fusion you bring out.
Future fusion coming back also gives a boost to the fusions that require two specific materials to summon not that they were ever good , but hey who cares? There are some specific material fusions that are actually good, and these will become a lot easier to summon.
The main reason people do not want to run this card is that it is now way too easy for your opponent to get this off the field without you getting any sort of benefit out of it. This is very true, since your opponent has a solid two turns to get future fusion off the field.
Most decks have enough draw power to pull this off every game. Not to mention, drident is also a thing. It can pop FF as soon as you activate it. In infernoids, future fusion is basically activate ff, mill all monsters in deck, gg? Using future fusion, you can mill every single infernoid monster in your deck, which is the ultimate grave set-up the deck could ask for.
Just had a look at the Limited Section at the official site. User Info: shadowdragoon User Info: Penguin I actually agree with you completely. User Info: keleks. Not really. Since Magician of Faith r now banned, it's pretty hard to get the future fusion back from the graveyard. N u know what happens if your enemy already sends all his monsters to the graveyard, but can't summon Worm Zero.
The same with F. Just use bottomless, n it's done for. User Info: pikapika User Info: Belgianblue. But that's cool since FGD in and of itself is not that broken. As was mentioned, if FF gets necked, the monster doesn't come out, a mystical can stop it for crying out loud, even after its summoned!!! Its like prem or call. Just add some dust tornadoes to your deck and you are golden. User Info: ShinZentetsu. More topics from this board
0コメント