There are two big reasons why the Tribunal is going to remain decommissioned for the foreseeable future. Right now, we have an automated system that roots out hate speech and inflammatory chat messages and punishes players over a very short amount of time. With tens of millions of players and one of the most infamously-toxic player bases on the market, the quicker solution is clearly the more effective one. When players could band together and get a player punished they could be rewarded with IP for a time, which, naturally, created an undeniable bias.
A summoner's score was increased when their vote agrees with the majority verdict. There were no rewards for obtaining a good justice rating. Any summoner that is level 20 Formerly 30 who isn't currently banned could participate in reviewing Tribunal cases. A summoner could review up to 20 cases a day. Summoners received a Justice Rating based on how often their votes coincided with the majority vote on cases. On the contrary, if a player repeatedly voted against the majority, they would lose the access to the Tribunal.
This system was used to encourage players to read thoroughly their assigned cases, instead of blindly punishing people. The following actions are violations of the Summoner's Code and considered punishable offences:.
It is important to note that occasionally having bad games is not considered a punishable offense, but it is possible to receive suspensions if deemed appropriate by a riot customer service representative as stated in the Tribunal FAQ.
When a summoner's case received a certain number of "punish" votes a number not divulged by Riot , they received a punishment intending to deter this behavior from happening again. Possible punishments included a warning, suspension, name change, or in severe cases, permanent banning. The Tribunal automatically assigned some low-level penalties to players, such as e-mail warnings. More severe cases, however, were reviewed and assigned punishments manually by Player Support.
Punishment was not influenced in any way by the number of votes. Under special circumstances, Riot Games could even veto the verdict of the Tribunal. League of Legends Wiki. We learned a lot from Tribunal when it was around, and it actually became one of the bases of our current models for abusive chats. A player-voted service like Tribunal comes with two huge drawbacks that are really tough to get around, though:. It really does make a difference.
At the same time, FotM allowed for some really egregious shield stacking when used with Locket.
0コメント